ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020
The Brevity Law as a Scaling Law, and a Possible Origin of Zipf's Law for Word Frequencies.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sources of Intelligibility of Distant Languages: An Empirical Study.Language and speech · 2026Article
- Word Length in Political Public Speaking: Distribution and Time Evolution.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Compression principle and Zipf's Law of brevity in infochemical communication.Biology letters · 2022Article
- Popularity of Video Games and Collective Memory.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Linguistic laws in biology.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2022Review
- Entropy Estimation Using a Linguistic Zipf-Mandelbrot-Li Model for Natural Sequences.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Principle of Least Effort and Sentence Length in Public Speaking.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Zipf's laws of meaning in Catalan.PloS one · 2021Article
- Information Theory and Language.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- From Boltzmann to Zipf through Shannon and Jaynes.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An important body of quantitative linguistics is constituted by a series of statistical laws about language usage. Despite the importance of these linguistic laws, some of them are poorly formulated, and, more importantly, there is no unified framework that encompasses all them. This paper presents a new perspective to establish a connection between different statistical linguistic laws. Characterizing each word type by two random variables-length (in number of characters) and absolute frequency-we show that the corresponding bivariate joint probability distribution shows a rich and precise phenomenology, with the type-length and the type-frequency distributions as its two marginals, and the conditional distribution of frequency at fixed length providing a clear formulation for the brevity-frequency phenomenon. The type-length distribution turns out to be well fitted by a gamma distribution (much better than with the previously proposed lognormal), and the conditional frequency distributions at fixed length display power-law-decay behavior with a fixed exponent α ≃ 1.4 and a characteristic-frequency crossover that scales as an inverse power δ ≃ 2.8 of length, which implies the fulfillment of a scaling law analogous to those found in the thermodynamics of critical phenomena. As a by-product, we find a possible model-free explanation for the origin of Zipf's law, which should arise as a mixture of conditional frequency distributions governed by the crossover length-dependent frequency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.