ArticleMedicine2020
Predictors of prolonged mechanical ventilation identified at an emergency visit for elderly people: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and evaluation of a PONV prediction model in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Association of HLA-DPA1 polymorphism with prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing liver transplantation.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Predictors of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Microsurgical Clipping.Neurology and therapy · 2022Article
- Endotracheal tube size selection in critically ill patients: a 4-year single-center experience in Saudi Arabia.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the factors that are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation in elderly patients.Retrospective cohort studySingle tertiary hospital in JapanWe retrospectively identified 228 patients aged 75 years or older who were admitted to a single tertiary care center in Japan between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 because of endogenous diseases and underwent mechanical ventilation.The primary outcome was extubation difficulty, which was defined as the need for mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days after intubation, reintubation within 72 hours after extubation, tracheotomy or extubation, or death within 14 days after intubation.A multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-1.38; P = .80), gender (OR = 0.56; 95%CI = 0.27-1.17; P = .13), body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.05; 95%CI = 0.98-1.14; P = .16), smoking history (OR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.29-1.41; P = .27), Activities of daily living (ADL) (OR = 0.95; 95%CI = 0.49-1.83; P = .87), and modified acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.95-1.09; P = .61) were not statistically significantly different. However, there were statistically significant differences in extubation difficulty between patients with diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.3; 95%CI = 1.01-5.12; P = .04) and those with cardiovascular disease diagnosis on admission (OR = 0.31; 95%CI = 0.1-0.97; P = .04).Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease diagnosis on admission were factors that were associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation in the elderly. The results of this study may help to support shared decision making with patients or surrogate decision makers at the start of intensive care in the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.