Observational studyMedicine2020
Excessive splenic volume is an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between splenic volume and the outcome of chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer has rarely been studied or addressed. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether splenic volume was associated with prognosis in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for advanced or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).A retrospective investigation was conducted. Finally, 202 patients met the criteria and were included in the study. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the optimum cutoff value of splenic volume for overall survival (OS). The optimum cutoff value was identified by X-tile software, and the OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the 2 groups of patients. The impact of splenic volume and other clinical characteristics on OS and DFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Clinical characteristics were compared using chi-square or Fisher exact tests.The median (range) of splenic volume was 156.03 (28.55-828.11) cm. The optimal cutoff value of splenic volume was 288.4 cm. For univariate analyses, high splenic volume was associated with decreased OS (P = .025) and DFS (P = .044). In multivariate analyses, splenic volume remained an independent predictor of OS as a binary dependent variable (P = .003).Excessive splenic volume was associated with decreased OS and DFS in patients with NSCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy. Splenic volume should be regarded as an independent prognostic factor for patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for advanced or locally advanced NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.