Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33285704›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Efficacy and safety of Maxing Shigan Decoction in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jinyun Chen, Chunrong Wang, Min Xiong, Qilin Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinyun ChenCollege of basic medicine, Chengdu university of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu.ORCID 0000-0003-3861-8255
Chunrong WangCollege of basic medicine, Chengdu university of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu.
Min XiongCollege of basic medicine, Chengdu university of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu.
Qilin ShenCollege of basic medicine, Mianyang traditional Chinese medicine hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2096-1445
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNMianyang Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the world but is projected to be the 3rd leading cause of death by 2030. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an important public health challenge, which can be prevented and treated. COPD is an important public health challenge, both preventable and treatable. In China, Maxing Shigan Decoction (MSD) has been used as a traditional Chinese medicine compound for the treatment of respiratory diseases for thousands of years. In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MSD in the treatment of COPD, we need to conduct meta-analysis and systematic reviews.

methodsThe data comes from 7 publicly published databases, including: PubMed, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Database(CBM), VIP Database, and Wanfang database. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MSD in the treatment of COPD. Result measurement indicators include: TCM syndrome scores, lung function indicators, serum inflammatory factors, blood gas indicators, adverse reactions. RevMan 5.0 will be used for meta-analysis.

resultsThis study will provide high-quality evidence for the effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicine therapy for COPD.

conclusionThe results of this study will help us determine whether MSD can effectively treat COPD. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All analyses in this study are based on previously published research, so this study does not require ethical approval or patient consent. We will disseminate our findings electronically or in print by publishing results in peer-reviewed journals. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/H5UNB.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalHumansInflammation MediatorsMeta-Analysis as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignRespiratory Function TestsSystematic Reviews as TopicDrugs, Chinese HerbalInflammation Mediatorsmaxingshigan

Identifiers

PMID33285704
PMCPMC7717823
OpenAlexW3111407873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.