ArticleMedicine2020
Clinical efficacy of phacoemulsification combined intraocular lens implantation for treatment of high myopia with cataract: A protocol of systematic review.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of capsule treatment on visual acuity and quality after phacoemulsification lens implantation in myopic patients with cataract.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of phacoemulsification combined intraocular lens implantation (PILI) for the treatment of high myopia with cataract (HMC).
methodsIn this study, the electronic databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, CINAHL, PsychINFO, CBM, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) will be searched from inception to present. All randomized controlled trials on assessing the PILI for patients with HMC will be included. Two authors will carry out study selection, information extraction, and study quality assessment, respectively. We will invite another author to solve any disagreement through discussion. RevMan 5.3 software will be performed for data synthesis and analysis.
resultsThis study will present a detailed synthesis and/or descriptive analysis of the most recent evidence to evaluate the efficacy of PILI for HMC.
conclusionThe results of this study may provide possible guidance to determine whether or not PILI is effective on HMC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.