Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33285664›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2020

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with Endostar in patients with pelvic locoregional recurrence of cervical cancer: Results from a hospital in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Kuan Zhang, Huiping Wang, Zhenqing Wang, Fuqing Li, Ying Cui, Shengchun Ma, Rui Chen, Yuhui Wang, Shul Guo, Ying Wei

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kuan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-8346
Huiping WangUltrasonic Medicine, Xining Maternal and Child Health Planning Branch Family Planning Service Centre, Qinghai, China.
Zhenqing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Fuqing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Ying CuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Shengchun MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Rui ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Yuhui WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Shul GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Ying WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital.
Qinghai Red Cross Hospital · CNMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of recurrent cervical cancer, especially pelvic locoregional recurrence, is very challenging for gynecologic oncologists. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with Endostar, a novel modified recombinant human endostatin, in patients with pelvic locoregional recurrence of cervical cancer following surgical treatment.This phase 2 study was conducted between May 2018 and May 2019 at a single center in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and enrolled 31 patients with pelvic locoregional recurrence of cervical cancer following surgical treatment. All patients were treated with IMRT-based CCRT for 6 weeks and intravenous infusions of Endostar (15 mg/m), which were administered on days 1 to 7 of CCRT, followed by rest for 4 weeks. After resting, chemotherapy with cisplatin (70 mg/m) plus paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m) was given every 3 weeks for a total of 4 treatments.Thirty-one patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The mean age was 50.03 years (SD 7.72). The objective response rate was 67.74% and the disease control rate was 83.87% (48.39% achieved a complete response, 19.35% a partial response, 16.13% had disease stabilization, and 16.13% had progressive disease). The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, alopecia, neutropenia, and leukopenia; most events were grade 1 or 2 in intensity. Grade 3 toxicities included thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in 2 patients each, and leukopenia in 4 patients. No cases of grade 4 acute toxicity were observed.IMRT-based CCRT with Endostar infusions is effective and safe. Our results support the use of this treatment for patients with pelvic locoregional recurrence of cervical cancer following surgical treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyCisplatinEndostatinsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaclitaxelRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRecombinant ProteinsTibetUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCisplatinendostar proteinEndostatinsPaclitaxelRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33285664
PMCPMC7717818
OpenAlexW3113352805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.