Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33285563›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Distinct Representational Structure and Localization for Visual Encoding and Recall during Visual Imagery.

Wilma A Bainbridge, Elizabeth H Hall, Chris I Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Functions of the posterior cingulate cortex and default network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Neural Underpinnings of Aphantasia: A Case Study of Identical Twins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perception and Memory Reinstatement Engage Overlapping Face-Selective Regions within Human Ventral Temporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Dissociable Contributions of the Medial Parietal Cortex to Recognition Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Representational formats of human memory traces.Brain structure & function · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wilma A BainbridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Elizabeth H HallLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Chris I BakerLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

Funding

Object, face, body and scene representations in the human brainZIAMH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2025
$25.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During memory recall and visual imagery, reinstatement is thought to occur as an echoing of the neural patterns during encoding. However, the precise information in these recall traces is relatively unknown, with previous work primarily investigating either broad distinctions or specific images, rarely bridging these levels of information. Using ultra-high-field (7T) functional magnetic resonance imaging with an item-based visual recall task, we conducted an in-depth comparison of encoding and recall along a spectrum of granularity, from coarse (scenes, objects) to mid (e.g., natural, manmade scenes) to fine (e.g., living room, cupcake) levels. In the scanner, participants viewed a trial-unique item, and after a distractor task, visually imagined the initial item. During encoding, we observed decodable information at all levels of granularity in category-selective visual cortex. In contrast, information during recall was primarily at the coarse level with fine-level information in some areas; there was no evidence of mid-level information. A closer look revealed segregation between voxels showing the strongest effects during encoding and those during recall, and peaks of encoding-recall similarity extended anterior to category-selective cortex. Collectively, these results suggest visual recall is not merely a reactivation of encoding patterns, displaying a different representational structure and localization from encoding, despite some overlap.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallPhotic StimulationVisual CortexYoung Adult7T fMRIencoding–recall similarityobjectsrepresentational similarity analysesscenes

Identifiers

PMID33285563
PMCPMC7945020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.