Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33285016›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2021

The project COMPASS protocol: Optimizing mindfulness and acceptance-based behavioral treatment for binge-eating spectrum disorders.

Adrienne S Juarascio, Christina R Felonis, Stephanie M Manasse, Paakhi Srivastava, Laura Boyajian, Evan M Forman, Fengqing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrienne S JuarascioDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christina R FelonisDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9964-2331
Stephanie M ManasseCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paakhi SrivastavaCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura BoyajianCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Evan M FormanDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fengqing ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Reward Re-Training: A new treatment to address reward imbalance during the COVID-19 pandemicR01MH122392 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI JUARASCIO, ADRIENNE SARAH · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
Does aberrant decision-making prevent success in adolescent behavioral weight loss treatment?K23DK124514 · NIDDK · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI MANASSE, STEPHANIE · 2020 to 2024
$897k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK124514NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes from cognitive behavioral therapy for binge-eating spectrum disorders are suboptimal, possibly due in part to deficits in self-regulation (i.e., the ability to control behavior in pursuit of long-term goals despite internal challenges). Mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments (MABTs) integrate behavioral treatment with psychological strategies designed to enhance self-regulation, yet little is known about how and for whom they are effective. The present study will utilize the multiphase optimization strategy to identify which of four MABT components (mindful awareness, distress tolerance, emotion modulation, values-based decision making) to include in a fully powered clinical trial. Participants (n = 256) will be randomized to 16 sessions in one of 16 conditions, each a different combination of MABT components being included or excluded from a base behavioral treatment. Our primary aim is to evaluate each component's independent efficacy on disordered eating symptoms. Our secondary aims are to confirm each component's target engagement (i.e., whether each component improves the targeted variable and outcomes), and test that each component's efficacy is moderated by baseline weaknesses in the same component (e.g., that participants with poor distress tolerance at baseline benefit most from the distress tolerance component). Our exploratory aim is to quantify the component interaction effects.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderCognitive Behavioral TherapyMindfulnessBehavior TherapyHumansTreatment Outcomebinge-eating disorderbulimia nervosacognitive behavioral therapydistress toleranceemotion modulationmindful awarenessmindfulness and acceptance-based treatmentmultiphase optimization strategyvalues-based decision making

Identifiers

PMID33285016
PMCPMC8101007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.