Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33284960›Full record

ReviewEndocrinology2021

Genome-Wide Estrogen Receptor Activity in Breast Cancer.

Anca M Farcas, Sankari Nagarajan, Sabina Cosulich, Jason S Carroll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Harnessing the Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Stringing along the estrogen receptor to engage with DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anca M FarcasBioscience, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Sankari NagarajanCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sabina CosulichProjects Group, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Jason S CarrollCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The largest subtype of breast cancer is characterized by the expression and activity of the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha/ER). Although several effective therapies have significantly improved survival, the adaptability of cancer cells means that patients frequently stop responding or develop resistance to endocrine treatment. ER does not function in isolation and multiple associating factors have been reported to play a role in regulating the estrogen-driven transcriptional program. This review focuses on the dynamic interplay between some of these factors which co-occupy ER-bound regulatory elements, their contribution to estrogen signaling, and their possible therapeutic applications. Furthermore, the review illustrates how some ER association partners can influence and reprogram the genomic distribution of the estrogen receptor. As this dynamic ER activity enables cancer cell adaptability and impacts the clinical outcome, defining how this plasticity is determined is fundamental to our understanding of the mechanisms of disease progression.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionEnhancer Elements, GeneticHumansReceptors, EstrogenTranscription FactorsReceptors, EstrogenTranscription FactorsBreast cancerchromatincofactorsenhancersestrogen receptor

Identifiers

PMID33284960
PMCPMC7787425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.