Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33284895›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2020

Differences in key genes in human alveolar macrophages between phenotypically normal smokers and nonsmokers: diagnostic and prognostic value in lung cancer.

Yi-De Wang, Zheng Li, Feng-Sen Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi-De WangDepartment of Integrated Pulmonology, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830000, China.
Zheng LiXinjiang National Clinical Research Base of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830000, China.
Feng-Sen LiXinjiang National Clinical Research Base of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830000, China.
Xinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the effect of smoking on gene expression in human alveolar macrophages and the value of identified key genes in the early diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancers.

methodsWe downloaded three data sets (GSE8823, GSE2125, and GSE3212) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, including 31 non-smoking and 33 smoking human alveolar macrophage samples. We identified common differentially expressed genes (DEGs), from which we obtained module genes and hub genes by using STRING and Cytoscape. Then we analyzed the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs, hub genes, and module genes and used David online analysis tool to carry out functional enrichment analysis of DEGs and module genes.

resultsA total of 85 differentially expressed genes was obtained, including 42 up-regulated genes and 43 down-regulated genes. The Human Protein Atlas and Survival analysis showed that GBP1, ITGAM, CSF1, SPP1, COL1A1, LAMB1 and THBS1 may be closely associated with the carcinogenesis and prognosis of lung cancer.

conclusionDEGs, module, and hub genes identified in the present study help explain the effects of smoking on human alveolar macrophages and provide candidate targets for diagnosis and treatment of smoking-related lung cancer.

Indexed as

alveolar macrophagesdiagnosisprognosisSmokingsmoking-related lung cancers

Identifiers

PMID33284895
PMCPMC7716130
OpenAlexW3112098508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.