ArticlePLoS genetics2020
3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome reorganisation and expansion shape 3D genome architecture and define a distinct regulatory landscape in coleoid cephalopods.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Convergence and conflict among telomere-specialized transposons across 60 million years of Drosophilid evolution.Genome research · 2026Article
- Dynamic reorganization of three-dimensional genome architecture during Populus diversification.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Causes and consequences of sex-chromosome turnovers in Diptera.Evolution letters · 2026Article
- Polymorphic 3D genome architecture mediated by transposable elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Retention of a singlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Chromosome compartment assembly is essential for subtelomeric gene silencing in trypanosomes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- 3D Genome Constrains Breakpoints of Inversions That Can Act as Barriers to Gene Flow in the Stickleback.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Genome Mountaineering: Expanding Horizons of the 3D Genome for the Intrepid Evolutionary Adventurer.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- Topologically associating domains and the evolution of three-dimensional genome architecture in rice.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Analysis of 30 chromosome-level Drosophila genome assemblies reveals dynamic evolution of centromeric satellite repeats.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary patterns and functional effects of 3D chromatin structures in butterflies with extensive genome rearrangements.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The probability of chromatin to be at the nuclear lamina has no systematic effect on its transcription level in fruit flies.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2024Article
- Emerging questions on the mechanisms and dynamics of 3D genome evolution in spiralians.Briefings in functional genomics · 2023Review
- Functional genomics in Spiralia.Briefings in functional genomics · 2023Article
- Epigenetic regulation of nuclear processes in fungal plant pathogens.PLoS pathogens · 2023Review
- Strong interactions between highly dynamic lamina-associated domains and the nuclear envelope stabilize the 3D architecture of Drosophila interphase chromatin.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2023Article
- Genomic rearrangements and evolutionary changes in 3D chromatin topologies in the cotton tribe (Gossypieae).BMC biology · 2023Article
- Folding Features and Dynamics of 3D Genome Architecture in Plant Fungal Pathogens.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Mode and Tempo of 3D Genome Evolution in Drosophila.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Topologically associating domains, or TADs, are functional units that organize chromosomes into 3D structures of interacting chromatin. TADs play an important role in regulating gene expression by constraining enhancer-promoter contacts and there is evidence that deletion of TAD boundaries leads to aberrant expression of neighboring genes. While the mechanisms of TAD formation have been well-studied, current knowledge on the patterns of TAD evolution across species is limited. Due to the integral role TADs play in gene regulation, their structure and organization is expected to be conserved during evolution. However, more recent research suggests that TAD structures diverge relatively rapidly. We use Hi-C chromosome conformation capture to measure evolutionary conservation of whole TADs and TAD boundary elements between D. melanogaster and D. triauraria, two early-branching species from the melanogaster species group which diverged ∼15 million years ago. We find that the majority of TADs have been reorganized since the common ancestor of D. melanogaster and D. triauraria, via a combination of chromosomal rearrangements and gain/loss of TAD boundaries. TAD reorganization between these two species is associated with a localized effect on gene expression, near the site of disruption. By separating TADs into subtypes based on their chromatin state, we find that different subtypes are evolving under different evolutionary forces. TADs enriched for broadly expressed, transcriptionally active genes are evolving rapidly, potentially due to positive selection, whereas TADs enriched for developmentally-regulated genes remain conserved, presumably due to their importance in restricting gene-regulatory element interactions. These results provide novel insight into the evolutionary dynamics of TADs and help to reconcile contradictory reports related to the evolutionary conservation of TADs and whether changes in TAD structure affect gene expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.