Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33284780›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

An Educational Network for Surgical Education Supported by Gamification Elements: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Natasha Guérard-Poirier, Michèle Beniey, Léamarie Meloche-Dumas, Florence Lebel-Guay, Bojana Misheva, Myriam Abbas, Malek Dhane, Myriam Elraheb, Adam Dubrowski, Erica Patocskai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04425499 (A Gamified Network for Surgical Education During COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04425499 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Gamified Network for Surgical Education During COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de MontréalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsAdvanced Suturing Skills, Surgical EducationArmsLearning running subcuticular sutures on the Gamified Educational Network
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha Guérard-PoirierFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-4576
Michèle BenieyDepartment of General Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2663-850X
Léamarie Meloche-DumasDepartment of General Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-9952
Florence Lebel-GuayFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4399-6659
Bojana MishevaDepartment of General Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-9072
Myriam AbbasFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9908-3317
Malek DhaneFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9661-2068
Myriam ElrahebFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3660-8101
Adam DubrowskiFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2074-0933
Erica PatocskaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-278X
Université de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAOntario Tech University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, medical students have learned surgical skills by observing a resident physician or surgeon who is performing the technique. Due to inconsistent practice opportunities in the clinical setting, a disparity of skill levels among students has been observed. In addition, the poor availability of faculty professors is a limiting factor in teaching and adequately preparing medical students for their clerkship years. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, medical students do not have access to traditional suturing learning opportunities. Didactic courses are available on videoconferencing platforms; however, these courses do not include technical training.

objectiveOur overarching goal is to evaluate the efficacy and usability of web-based peer-learning for advanced suturing techniques (ie, running subcuticular sutures). We will use the Gamified Educational Network (GEN), a newly developed web-based learning tool. We will assess students' ability to identify and perform the correct technique. We will also assess the students' satisfaction with regard to GEN.

methodsWe will conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial with blinding of expert examiners. First-year medical students in the Faculty of Medicine of Université de Montréal will be randomized into four groups: (1) control, (2) self-learning, (3) peer-learning, and (4) peer-learning with expert feedback. Each arm will have 15 participants who will learn how to perform running subcuticular sutures through videos on GEN. For our primary outcome, the students' ability to identify the correct technique will be evaluated before and after the intervention on GEN. The students will view eight videos and rate the surgical techniques using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills Global Rating Scale and the Subcuticular Suture Checklist as evaluation criteria. For our secondary outcomes, students will anonymously record themselves performing a running subcuticular suture and will be evaluated using the same scales. Then, a survey will be sent to assess the students' acceptance of the intervention.

resultsThe study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by our institutional review board (CERSES 20-068-D). No participants have been recruited yet.

conclusionsPeer learning through GEN has the potential to overcome significant limitations related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the lack of availability of faculty professors. Further, a decrease of the anxiety related to traditional suturing classes can be expected. We aim to create an innovative and sustainable method of teaching surgical skills to improve the efficiency and quality of surgical training in medical faculties. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need for such tools is imperative.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04425499; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04425499. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/21273.

Indexed as

advanced suturesCOVID-19distance learninggamificationlearning platformmedical educationmedical studentpeer learningsubcuticular suturessurgerysurgical pedagogyvideoweb-based learningweb-based tool

Identifiers

PMID33284780
PMCPMC7744140
OpenAlexW3107664846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.