ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2021
Analytic Global Regularized Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clutter-Generating Phantom Material. Part II: Utilization in the Comparison of Conventional and Regularized Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Simultaneous imaging of ultrasonic relative backscatter and attenuation coefficients for quantitative liver steatosis assessment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- High-Resolution Ultrasound Characterization of Local Scattering in Cancer Tissue.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
- Robust Scatterer Number Density Segmentation of Ultrasound Images.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
- Quantitative ultrasound imaging of soft biological tissues: a primer for radiologists and medical physicists.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although a variety of techniques have been developed to reduce the appearance of B-mode speckle, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) aims at extracting the hidden properties of the tissue. Herein, we propose two novel techniques to accurately and precisely estimate two important QUS parameters, namely, the average attenuation coefficient and the backscatter coefficient. Both the techniques optimize a cost function that incorporates data and continuity constraint terms, which we call AnaLytical Global rEgularized BackscatteR quAntitative ultrasound (ALGEBRA). We propose two versions of ALGEBRA, namely, 1-D- and 2-D-ALGEBRA. In 1-D-ALGEBRA, the regularized cost function is formulated in the axial direction, and the QUS parameters are calculated for one line of radio frequency (RF) echo data. In 2-D-ALGEBRA, the regularized cost function is formulated for the entire image, and the QUS parameters throughout the image are estimated simultaneously. This simultaneous optimization allows 2-D-ALGEBRA to "see" all the data before estimating the QUS parameters. In both the methods, we efficiently optimize the cost functions by casting it as a sparse linear system of equations. As a result of this efficient optimization, 1-D-ALGEBRA and 2-D-ALGEBRA are, respectively, 600 and 300 times faster than optimization using the dynamic programming (DP) method previously proposed by our group. In addition, the proposed technique has fewer input parameters that require manual tuning. Our results demonstrate that the proposed ALGEBRA methods substantially outperform least-square and DP methods in estimating the QUS parameters in phantom experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.