Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33284525›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

The importance of understanding and measuring health system structural, functional, and clinical integration.

M Susan Ridgely, Christine Buttorff, Laura J Wolf, Erin Lindsey Duffy, Ashlyn K Tom, Cheryl L Damberg, Dennis P Scanlon, Mary E Vaiana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Community Characteristics Associated With Health System Penetration.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The promise and peril of health systems.Health services research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Making integration work.Health services research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M Susan RidgelyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1113-6168
Christine ButtorffRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4993-2581
Laura J WolfCenter for Health Care and Policy Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7273-1676
Erin Lindsey DuffyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4948-1872
Ashlyn K TomRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9561-4846
Cheryl L DambergRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8169-9420
Dennis P ScanlonCenter for Health Care and Policy Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-4372
Mary E VaianaRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.

Funding

Understanding Health Care Delivery Systems PCOR Adoption and System PerformanceU19HS024067 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI DAMBERG, CHERYL · 2015 to 2019
$17.4M
AHRQ HHS U19 HS024067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe explore if there are ways to characterize health systems-not already revealed by secondary data-that could provide new insights into differences in health system performance. We sought to collect rich qualitative data to reveal whether and to what extent health systems vary in important ways across dimensions of structural, functional, and clinical integration. DATA SOURCES: Interviews with 162 c-suite executives of 24 health systems in four states conducted through "virtual" site visits between 2017 and 2019. STUDY

designExploratory study using thematic comparative analysis to describe factors that may lead to high performance. DATA COLLECTION: We used maximum variation sampling to achieve diversity in size and performance. We conducted, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in-depth, semi-structured interviews with system executives, covering such topics as market context, health system origin, organizational structure, governance features, and relationship of health system to affiliated hospitals and POs. PRINCIPAL

findingsHealth systems vary widely in size and ownership type, complexity of organization and governance arrangements, and ability to take on risk. Structural, functional, and clinical integration vary across systems, with considerable activity around centralizing business functions, aligning financial incentives with physicians, establishing enterprise-wide EHR, and moving toward single signatory contracting. Executives describe clinical integration as more difficult to achieve, but essential. Studies that treat "health system" as a binary variable may be inappropriately aggregating for analysis health systems of very different types, at different degrees of maturity, and at different stages of structural, functional, and clinical integration. As a result, a "signal" indicating performance may be distorted by the "noise."

conclusionsDeveloping ways to account for the complex structures of today's health systems can enhance future efforts to study systems as complex organizations, to assess their performance, and to better understand the effects of payment innovation, care redesign, and other reforms.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEconomic CompetitionEfficiency, OrganizationalHealth Facility MergerHealth Information SystemsHealth Services ResearchHumansInterinstitutional RelationsInterviews as TopicModels, OrganizationalQuality of Health CareUnited Stateshealth care organizationhealth services researchhealth systemhospital-physician affiliationintegrated delivery systemqualitative researchvertical integration

Identifiers

PMID33284525
PMCPMC7720708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.