Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33284524›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

Understanding how health systems facilitate primary care redesign.

Jillian B Harvey, Jocelyn Vanderbrink, Yasmin Mahmud, Erin Kitt-Lewis, Laura Wolf, Bethany Shaw, M Susan Ridgely, Cheryl L Damberg, Dennis P Scanlon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Community Characteristics Associated With Health System Penetration.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2026
    Article
  3. From Co-Design to Quality Improvement: Using the Double Diamond Framework to Develop Primary Care Redesign Priorities for Hypertension Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Making integration work.Health services research · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian B HarveyThe Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-8226
Jocelyn VanderbrinkThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yasmin MahmudThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Erin Kitt-LewisThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura WolfThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bethany ShawThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
M Susan RidgelyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1113-6168
Cheryl L DambergRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Dennis P ScanlonThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-4372
Pennsylvania State University · USRAND Corporation · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Understanding Health Care Delivery Systems PCOR Adoption and System PerformanceU19HS024067 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI DAMBERG, CHERYL · 2015 to 2019
$17.4M
AHRQ HHS U19 HS024067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how health systems are facilitating primary care redesign (PCR), examine the PCR initiatives taking place within systems, and identify barriers to this work. STUDY

settingA purposive sample of 24 health systems in 4 states. STUDY

designData were systematically reviewed to identify how system leaders define and implement initiatives to redesign primary care delivery and identify challenges. Researchers applied codes which were based on the theoretical PCR literature and created new codes to capture emerging themes. Investigators analyzed coded data then produced and applied a thematic analysis to examine how health systems facilitate PCR. DATA COLLECTION: Semi-structured telephone interviews with 162 system executives and physician organization leaders from 24 systems. PRINCIPAL

findingsLeaders at all 24 health systems described initiatives to redesign the delivery of primary care, but many were in the early stages. Respondents described the use of centralized health system resources to facilitate PCR initiatives, such as regionalized care coordinators, and integrated electronic health records. Team-based care, population management, and care coordination were the most commonly described initiatives to transform primary care delivery. Respondents most often cited improving efficiency and enhancing clinician job satisfaction, as motivating factors for team-based care. Changes in payment and risk assumption as well as community needs were commonly cited motivators for population health management and care coordination. Return on investment and the slower than anticipated rate in moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment were noted by multiple respondents as challenges health systems face in redesigning primary care.

conclusionsGiven their expanding role in health care and the potential to leverage resources, health systems are promising entities to promote the advancement of PCR. Systems demonstrate interest and engagement in this work but face significant challenges in getting to scale until payment models are in alignment with these efforts.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEfficiency, OrganizationalElectronic Health RecordsHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementJob SatisfactionMotivationPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareRisk Managementhealth care organizations and systemsprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID33284524
PMCPMC7720713
OpenAlexW3111649340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.