Trial reportJAMA network open2020
Effect of Routine Cytochrome P450 2D6 and 2C19 Genotyping on Antipsychotic Drug Persistence in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00707382 (A Three-armed Randomised Controled Trial on the Effect of Genotyping for CYP450 Polymorphisms and Intense Clinical Monitoring on Antipsychotic Drug Treatment.), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Three-armed Randomised Controled Trial on the Effect of Genotyping for CYP450 Polymorphisms and Intense Clinical Monitoring on Antipsychotic Drug Treatment.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenomics-assisted treatment versus standard of care in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetic Markers of Clinical Outcomes in Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Multigenetic Pharmacogenomics-Guided Treatment vs Treatment As Usual Among Hospitalized Men With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Evaluating the clinical efficacy of combinatorial pharmacogenomic-guided treatment in schizophrenia patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Psychiatric pharmacogenomics: from genetic evidence to clinical integration - structural, educational, and ethical challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenomics-guided treatment versus conventional treatment in patients with Schizophrenia: Evaluation of medication adherence and switching rate.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Effect ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Patient and clinician perspectives on pharmacogenetic testing for antipsychotics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- A systematic review of pharmacogenetic testing to guide antipsychotic treatment.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
- Prediction of antipsychotics efficacy based on a polygenic risk score: a real-world cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Is the CYP2D6 Genotype Associated with Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Language-agnostic pharmacovigilant text mining to elicit side effects from clinical notes and hospital medication records.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2022Article
- The Utility of Pharmacogenetics Testing in Psychiatric Populations.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Pharmacogenetic genotype and phenotype frequencies in a large Danish population-based case-cohort sample.Translational psychiatry · 2021Article
- CYP2D6 Genetic Variation and Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Genetic Polymorphisms of Very Important Pharmacogene Variants in the Blang Population from Yunnan Province in China.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Genetic polymorphism of genes encoding the drug metabolizing enzymes, cytochrome P450 2D6 and 2C19 (CYP2D6 and CYP2C19), is associated with treatment failure of and adverse reactions to psychotropic drugs. The clinical utility of routine CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping (CYP testing) is unclear. Objective: To estimate whether routine CYP testing effects the persistence of antipsychotic drug treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-masked, 3-group randomized clinical trial included patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed within the schizophrenic spectrum (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes, F20-F29) and not previously genotyped. A total of 669 of 1406 potentially eligible patients from 12 psychiatric outpatient clinics in Denmark were approached between July 2008 and December 2009. Overall, 528 patients were genotyped and randomly allocated to 1 of 3 study groups or exclusion in a sequence of 1:1:1:3 using a predictive enrichment design, aiming to double the proportion of poor or ultrarapid metabolizers for CYP2D6 or CYP2C19. Outcome measurements were recorded at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Data analysis was performed in December 2012 and updated March 2019. Interventions: The trial included 2 intervention groups, where antipsychotic drug treatment was guided by either CYP test (CYP test-guided [CTG]) or structured clinical monitoring (SCM), in which adverse effects and factors influencing compliance were systematically recorded at least once quarterly, and 1 control group. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was antipsychotic drug persistence, ie, days to first modification of the initial treatment. Secondary outcomes were number of drug and dose changes, adverse effects, and psychotic symptoms, ie, hallucinations and delusions. Results: A total of 528 participants were genotyped, and 311 (median [interquartile range {IQR} age, 41 [30-50] years; 139 [45%] women; median [IQR] duration of illness, 6 [3-13] years) were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 study groups. Overall, 61 participants (20%) were extreme metabolizers. There was no difference in antipsychotic drug persistence between the CTG group and the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.71-1.45) or SCM and the control group (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.61-1.26). Subanalyses among extreme metabolizers showed similar results (CTG: HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.48-2.03; SCM: HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.44-1.96). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial do not support routine CYP testing in patients with schizophrenia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00707382.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.