Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33284107›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Learning speed and detection sensitivity controlled by distinct cortico-fugal neurons in visual cortex.

Sarah Ruediger, Massimo Scanziani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuronal Features of Visual Attention in the Mouse Superior Colliculus Depend on Learned Behavioral Relevance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Auditory Corticofugal Neurons Transmit Auditory and Non-auditory Information During Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. How deep is the brain? The shallow brain hypothesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah RuedigerCenter for Neural Circuits and Behavior, Neurobiology Section and Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6684-4693
Massimo ScanzianiCenter for Neural Circuits and Behavior, Neurobiology Section and Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-9686
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

MAPPING RETINOTECTAL CIRCUITS FOR VISUAL-EVOKED INNATE BEHAVIORSR01NS123912 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DUAN, XIN, SCANZIANI, MASSIMO · 2021 to 2025
$3.6M
Neural Circuits for the Cortical Control of the Optokinetic ReflexR01EY025668 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCANZIANI, MASSIMO · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025668NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123912Swiss National Science Foundation 138719Swiss National Science Foundation 151168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrates can change their behavior upon detection of visual stimuli according to the outcome their actions produce. Such goal-directed behavior involves evolutionary conserved brain structures like the striatum and optic tectum, which receive ascending visual input from the periphery. In mammals, however, these structures also receive descending visual input from visual cortex (VC), via neurons that give rise to cortico-fugal projections. The function of cortico-fugal neurons in visually guided, goal-directed behavior remains unclear. Here, we address the impact of two populations of cortico-fugal neurons in mouse VC in the learning and performance of a visual detection task. We show that the ablation of striatal projecting neurons reduces learning speed, whereas the ablation of superior colliculus projecting neurons does not impact learning but reduces detection sensitivity. This functional dissociation between distinct cortico-fugal neurons in controlling learning speed and detection sensitivity suggests an adaptive contribution of cortico-fugal pathways even in simple goal-directed behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsLearningMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeural PathwaysNeuronsVisual CortexVisual Perceptionbehaviorcortexcortico-fugal pathwaysmouseneurosciencestriatumsuperior colliculusvision

Identifiers

PMID33284107
PMCPMC7748414
OpenAlexW3112635271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.