Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33284047›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2020

Understanding the Impact of Rainfall on Diarrhea: Testing the Concentration-Dilution Hypothesis Using a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alicia N M Kraay, Olivia Man, Morgan C Levy, Karen Levy, Edward Ionides, Joseph N S Eisenberg

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Waterborne diseases and climate change.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia N M KraayDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Olivia ManDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Morgan C LevyScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Karen LevyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Edward IonidesDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Joseph N S EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · USEmory University · USScripps Institution of Oceanography · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Environment Change and Diarrheal Disease: A Natural ExperimentR01AI050038 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EISENBERG, JOSEPH N. S. · 2003 to 2012
$6.1M
Gut microbiome, enteric infections and child growth across a rurual urban gradientR01AI137679 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EISENBERG, JOSEPH N. S., LEVY, KAREN · 2018 to 2023
$5.3M
Spatio-temporal data integration methods for infectious disease surveillanceR01AI125842 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CHANG, HOWARD H, REMAIS, JUSTIN V · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Modeling the Effects of the Environment on Enteric Pathogen DynamicsU01GM110712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EISENBERG, JOSEPH N. S. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
Impacts of Human Movement on Regional Strain Distribution of Diarrheagenic E.coliK01AI103544 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, KAREN · 2013 to 2017
$655k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI103544NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050038NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125842NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137679NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM110712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProjected increases in extreme weather may change relationships between rain-related climate exposures and diarrheal disease. Whether rainfall increases or decreases diarrhea rates is unclear based on prior literature. The concentration-dilution hypothesis suggests that these conflicting results are explained by the background level of rain: Rainfall following dry periods can flush pathogens into surface water, increasing diarrhea incidence, whereas rainfall following wet periods can dilute pathogen concentrations in surface water, thereby decreasing diarrhea incidence.

objectivesIn this analysis, we explored the extent to which the concentration-dilution hypothesis is supported by published literature.

methodsTo this end, we conducted a systematic search for articles assessing the relationship between rain, extreme rain, flood, drought, and season (rainy vs. dry) and diarrheal illness.

resultsA total of 111 articles met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the literature largely supports the concentration-dilution hypothesis. In particular, extreme rain was associated with increased diarrhea when it followed a dry period [incidence rate ratio DISCUSSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that the effect of rainfall depends on the antecedent conditions. Future studies should use standard, clearly defined exposure variables to strengthen understanding of the relationship between rainfall and diarrheal illness. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6181.

Indexed as

RainWater MicrobiologyDiarrheaEnvironmental Exposure

Identifiers

PMID33284047
PMCPMC7720804
OpenAlexW3111955347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.