Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33283865›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

Symbiotic and Nonsymbiotic Members of the Genus Ensifer (syn. Sinorhizobium) Are Separated into Two Clades Based on Comparative Genomics and High-Throughput Phenotyping.

Camilla Fagorzi, Alexandru Ilie, Francesca Decorosi, Lisa Cangioli, Carlo Viti, Alessio Mengoni, George C diCenzo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidelines for the description of rhizobial symbiovars.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Updated taxonomy of the familyInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Complete Genome Sequences of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv.Microbiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilla FagorziDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Alexandru IlieDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Francesca DecorosiGenexpress Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Lisa CangioliDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Carlo VitiGenexpress Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Alessio MengoniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
George C diCenzoDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
University of Florence · ITQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizobium-legume symbioses serve as paradigmatic examples for the study of mutualism evolution. The genus Ensifer (syn. Sinorhizobium) contains diverse plant-associated bacteria, a subset of which can fix nitrogen in symbiosis with legumes. To gain insights into the evolution of symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF), and interkingdom mutualisms more generally, we performed extensive phenotypic, genomic, and phylogenetic analyses of the genus Ensifer. The data suggest that SNF likely emerged several times within the genus Ensifer through independent horizontal gene transfer events. Yet, the majority (105 of 106) of the Ensifer strains with the nodABC and nifHDK nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes were found within a single, monophyletic clade. Comparative genomics highlighted several differences between the "symbiotic" and "nonsymbiotic" clades, including divergences in their pangenome content. Additionally, strains of the symbiotic clade carried 325 fewer genes, on average, and appeared to have fewer rRNA operons than strains of the nonsymbiotic clade. Initial characterization of a subset of ten Ensifer strains identified several putative phenotypic differences between the clades. Tested strains of the nonsymbiotic clade could catabolize 25% more carbon sources, on average, than strains of the symbiotic clade, and they were better able to grow in LB medium and tolerate alkaline conditions. On the other hand, the tested strains of the symbiotic clade were better able to tolerate heat stress and acidic conditions. We suggest that these data support the division of the genus Ensifer into two main subgroups, as well as the hypothesis that pre-existing genetic features are required to facilitate the evolution of SNF in bacteria.

Indexed as

PhylogenyFabaceaeGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, BacterialGenomicsMicroarray AnalysisNitrogen FixationSinorhizobiumSymbiosiscomparative genomicsevolutionary biologymutualismphenomicsProteobacteriarhizobia

Identifiers

PMID33283865
PMCPMC7719227
OpenAlexW3112329158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.