Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33283635›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2021

Extrapolating Parametric Survival Models in Health Technology Assessment: A Simulation Study.

Daniel Gallacher, Peter Kimani, Nigel Stallard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Limited Sample Size and Follow-up on Partitioned Survival and Multistate Modeling-Based Health Economic Models: A Simulation Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SurvInt: a simple tool to obtain precise parametric survival extrapolations.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  6. Survival Extrapolation Incorporating General Population Mortality Using Excess Hazard and Cure Models: A Tutorial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Efficient Method for Computing Expected Value of Sample Information for Survival Data from an Ongoing Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel GallacherWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-9384
Peter KimaniWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-3173
Nigel StallardWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK.
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrapolations of parametric survival models fitted to censored data are routinely used in the assessment of health technologies to estimate mean survival, particularly in diseases that potentially reduce the life expectancy of patients. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) are commonly used in health technology assessment alongside an assessment of plausibility to determine which statistical model best fits the data and should be used for prediction of long-term treatment effects. We compare fit and estimates of restricted mean survival time (RMST) from 8 parametric models and contrast models preferred in terms of AIC, BIC, and log-likelihood, without considering model plausibility. We assess the methods' suitability for selecting a parametric model through simulation of data replicating the follow-up of intervention arms for various time-to-event outcomes from 4 clinical trials. Follow-up was replicated through the consideration of recruitment duration and minimum and maximum follow-up times. Ten thousand simulations of each scenario were performed. We demonstrate that the different methods can result in disagreement over the best model and that it is inappropriate to base model selection solely on goodness-of-fit statistics without consideration of hazard behavior and plausibility of extrapolations. We show that typical trial follow-up can be unsuitable for extrapolation, resulting in unreliable estimation of multiple parameter models, and infer that selecting survival models based only on goodness-of-fit statistics is unsuitable due to the high level of uncertainty in a cost-effectiveness analysis. This article demonstrates the potential problems of overreliance on goodness-of-fit statistics when selecting a model for extrapolation. When follow-up is more mature, BIC appears superior to the other selection methods, selecting models with the most accurate and least biased estimates of RMST.

Indexed as

Models, EconomicSurvival AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansTechnology Assessment, Biomedicalcancerextrapolationhealth technology assessmentMonte Carlo simulationsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID33283635
PMCPMC7780268
OpenAlexW3113114096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.