ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2020
Safety and feasibility of the Woven EndoBridge device deployment with monitored anesthesia care.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends of Expanding Indications of Woven EndoBridge Devices for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Pooled it
- Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after endovascular treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A pilot study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device can be used for complex intracranial aneurysms (IAs), mostly under general anesthesia (GA). However, it remains controversial if anesthetic management could affect procedural outcomes after endovascular treatments using the WEB for IAs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and feasibility of the WEB deployment for patients under monitored anesthesia care (MAC).
methodsWe reviewed 27 IAs in 25 patients who were treated by using the WEB device from February to December in 2019. Our first-line anesthetic management of patients during the procedures was the MAC. GA was performed based on patient's clinical status or preference. Subjects' demographic data, aneurysms' characteristics, procedure-related complications, grade of stasis after the WEB deployment, duration of procedure, and length of hospital stay were compared between subjects who underwent GA versus those who underwent MAC.
resultsSuccessful deployment of the WEB device was obtained in all patients. In total, 10 and 17 IAs were treated with GA and MAC, respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics (age:
conclusionsMAC can be used for the WEB device deployment safely and effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.