Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Independent Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of peripheral arterial disease and cerebrovascular disease on outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic Significance of Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- The Impact of Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes Following ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Life-threatening subclavian artery bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Independent Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, in some studies PAD is not an independent risk factor. We sought to examine the independent impact of PAD on a large prospective percutaneous coronary intervention registry. Methods and Results From our single-center prospective percutaneous coronary intervention registry, we have retrospectively analyzed 25 690 patients (years 2004-2018). We examined the influence of PAD on short- and long-term outcomes using both regression and propensity-matched analyses. Patients with documented PAD (n=1610, 6.3% of total) were older (66.7±10.8 versus 65.4±12.1,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.