ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021
Evaluation of the London Smoking Cessation Transformation Programme: a time-series analysis.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.Nature human behaviour · 2024Pooled it
- Ethnic and Regional Disparities in Self-Reported Smoking Cessation Success: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Local Authority-Level Data in England.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trends in smoking prevalence and socio-economic inequalities across regions in England: A population study, 2006 to 2024.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Observational
- Evaluating smoking cessation strategies in thoracic surgery outpatient clinics.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Regional Tobacco Control Program (Greater Manchester's Making Smoking History) on Quitting and Smoking in England 2014-2022: A Time-Series Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024Article
- Human and environmental health concerns: What differences are required to make the difference?Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the London Smoking Cessation Transformation Programme: a time-series analysis.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimNational social marketing campaigns have been shown to promote smoking cessation in England. There is reason to believe that regional and city-wide campaigns can play a valuable role in reducing smoking prevalence over and above any national tobacco control activity. This study aimed to assess the impact of the London Smoking Cessation Transformation Programme, a multi-component citywide smoking cessation programme, on quit attempts and quit success rates. DESIGN AND
settingInterrupted time-series analyses, using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and generalized additive models (GAM) of population trends in the difference between monthly quit attempts and quit success rates among smokers who made a quit attempt in London versus the rest of England before and during the first year of the programme.
participantsA total of 55 528 past-year adult smokers who participated in a monthly series of nationally representative cross-sectional surveys in England between November 2006 and August 2018. Twelve and a half per cent of smokers lived in London (intervention region) and 87.5% lived in the rest of England (control region). MEASUREMENTS: Monthly prevalence of quit attempts and quit success rates among smokers who made a quit attempt.
findingsThe monthly difference in prevalence of quit attempts in London compared with the rest of England increased by 9.59% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.35-14.83, P < 0.001] from a mean of 0.04% pre-intervention to 9.63% post-intervention. The observed increase in success rates among those who tried was not statistically significant (B = 4.72; 95% CI = -2.68 to 12.11, P = 0.21); Bayes factors indicated that these data were insensitive. GAM analyses confirmed these results.
conclusionThe promotion of the London Smoking Cessation Transformation Programme during September 2017 was associated with a significant increase in quit attempts compared with the rest of England. The results were inconclusive regarding an effect on quit success among those who tried.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.