Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33283253›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2020

SPLEnic salvage and complications after splenic artery EmbolizatioN for blunt abdomINal trauma: the SPLEEN-IN study.

Warren Clements, Tim Joseph, Jim Koukounaras, Gerard S Goh, Heather K Moriarty, Joseph Mathew, Tuan D Phan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Solid Organ Injuries: To Irradiate or Operate?Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Warren ClementsDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. W.clements@alfred.org.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-5850
Tim JosephDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Jim KoukounarasDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9795-9477
Gerard S GohDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1552-5470
Heather K MoriartyDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-0334
Joseph MathewNational Trauma Research Institute, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-682X
Tuan D PhanDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Alfred Health · AUNational Trauma Research Institute · AUMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs an adjunct to non-operative management, splenic artery embolization (SAE) has been increasingly utilized throughout the world and is now the standard of care for hemodynamically stable patients. This study aimed to retrospectively assess the rate of splenic salvage and complications after SAE for blunt trauma at a level 1 trauma center using the 2018 update to the AAST criteria, and further sub-stratify the role of angiography in AAST grade III injuries with significant hemoperitoneum. All patients between 1 January 2009 and 1 January 2019 who underwent blunt trauma and proceeded to embolization were included. Data was collected concerning initial injury grade, location of embolization, type of embolic material used, complications, and need for subsequent splenectomy. Technical success was defined as successful angiographic occlusion of the target artery at the conclusion of embolization. Clinical success was defined as splenic salvage at discharge. Vascular lesions were characterized including those with active bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, and arterio-venous fistula.

resultsTwo hundred thirty-two patients were included in the study. Treatments were performed at a median of 0 days (range 0-28 days) and the median AAST grade was IV (range III-V). Technical success was achieved in all patients. There were 13 complications (5.6%) consisting of re-bleed (9, 3.9%), infarction (3, 1.3%), and access site haematoma (1, 0.43%). Clinical success was achieved in 97% of patients with 7 patients requiring splenectomy after SAE (3.0%) at a median time of 4 days (range 0-17 days). Angiography in patients with grade III injuries identified 18 occult vascular injuries not identified at initial CT (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThe SPLEEN-IN study shows that treatment of intermediate-high grade blunt force traumatic splenic injuries using SAE resulted in a low rate of complication and splenic salvage in 97% of patients, providing a safe and effective treatment in stable patients. In addition, angiography of grade III injuries identified occult vascular lesions and may warrant treatment of select patients in this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Indexed as

EmbolizationHemorrhageSAESpleenTrauma

Identifiers

PMID33283253
PMCPMC7719586
OpenAlexW3113302058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.