Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33283132›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2020

Measuring Tumor Epichaperome Expression Using [

Komal L Jhaveri, Carlos H Dos Anjos, Tony Taldone, Rui Wang, Elizabeth Comen, Monica Fornier, Jacqueline F Bromberg, Weining Ma, Sujata Patil, Anna Rodina and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Synthesis ofSTAR protocols · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Komal L JhaveriOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Carlos H Dos AnjosOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-0882
Tony TaldoneOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Rui WangOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Elizabeth ComenOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Monica FornierOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Jacqueline F BrombergOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Weining MaOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sujata PatilOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Anna RodinaOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Nagavarakishore PillarsettyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1750-7436
Susan DugganSamus Therapeutics, Topsfield, MA.
Sarhe KhoshiOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Nathan KadijaOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Gabriela ChiosisOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0486-6920
Mark P DunphyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Shanu ModiOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Project 3: Structural Basis for grp94 Drug Development and Chaperone FunctionP01CA186866 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GEWIRTH, DANIEL T · 2015 to 2019
$6.7M
Chaperome networks in Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG067598 · NIA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ARANCIO, OTTAVIO, CHIOSIS, GABRIELA · 2021 to 2025
$5.9M
Biomarkers for predicting response to Hsp90 therapyR01CA172546 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHIOSIS, GABRIELA, DUNPHY, MARK P. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA186866NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172546NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEpichaperome network maintenance is vital to survival of tumors that express it. PU-H71 is an epichaperome inhibitor that binds to the ATP-binding site of HSP90 and has demonstrated antitumor activity in breast cancer xenograft models and clinical safety in patients. PU-positron emission tomography (PET) is a theragnostic imaging tool that allows visualization of the epichaperome target. In this phase Ib trial, we present safety and tolerability for PU-H71 plus nab-paclitaxel in HER2-negative patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the utility of PU-PET as a noninvasive predictive biomarker.

methodsWe performed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation study with escalating PU-H71 doses and standard nab-paclitaxel. The primary objective was to establish safety and determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives were to assess pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy. Patients could enroll in a companion PU-PET protocol to measure epichaperome expression before treatment initiation to allow exploratory correlation with treatment benefit.

resultsOf the 12 patients enrolled, dose-limiting toxicity occurred in one patient (G3 neutropenic fever) at dose level 1; MTD of PU-H71 was 300 mg/m

conclusionThe combination of PU-H71 and nab-paclitaxel was well tolerated, with evidence of clinical activity. More durable disease control without progression was observed in patients with high baseline epichaperome expression. A phase II trial of this combination with PU-PET as a companion diagnostic for patient selection is currently planned.

Identifiers

PMID33283132
PMCPMC7713524
OpenAlexW3104308641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.