Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33283033›Full record

ReviewEthics, medicine, and public health2021

Toward establishing telepsychology guideline. Turning the challenges of COVID-19 into opportunity.

M M J Alqahtani, H A Alkhamees, A M Alkhalaf, S S Alarjan, H S Alzahrani, G F AlSaad, F H Alhrbi, S H Wahass, A H Khayat, K M M Alqahtani

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ethics, medicine, and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Telerehabilitation in Saudi Arabia.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

M M J AlqahtaniPsychology department, King Khalid university, Saudi Arabia.
H A AlkhameesClinical psychology unit, Prince Mohammed Bin Salman centre for autism and developmental disorders, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
A M AlkhalafClinical psychology and community counselling unit, psychiatry & mental health services division, Neuroscience Institute, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
S S AlarjanDepartment of adult mental health, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
H S AlzahraniMental health department, National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
G F AlSaadDepartment of psychiatry, King Saud university Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
F H AlhrbiMinistry of Education, Unayzah colleges, Al-Qassim, Alqassim, Saudi Arabia.
S H WahassDepartment of psychiatry, College of medicine, Imam Abudulrahman Bin Faisal university, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
A H KhayatPsychology department, King Abdulaziz university, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
K M M AlqahtaniMinistry of Health, Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SAKing Khalid University · SAKing Saud Medical City · SAMinistry of Education · SAMinistry of Health · SARiyadh Armed Forces Hospital · SASaudi Aramco Medical Services Organization · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has obstructed the classical practices of psychological assessment and intervention via face-to-face interaction. Patients and all health professionals have been forced to isolate and become innovative to continue receiving and providing exceptional healthcare services while minimizing the risk of exposure to, or transmission of, COVID-19.

aimThis document is proposed initially as a guide to the extraordinary implementation of telepsychology in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and to extend its implementation to use fundamentally as the main guideline for telepsychology services in Saudi Arabia and other Arabic communities.

methodA professional task force representing different areas of professional psychology reviewed, summarized, and documented methods, policies, procedures, and other resources to ensure that the recommendations and evidence reviews were valid and consistent with best practices.

resultsThe practice of telepsychology involves the consideration of legal and professional requirements. This paper provides a guideline and recommendations for procedural changes that are necessary to address psychological services as we transition to telepsychology, as well as elucidates and demonstrates practical telepsychology frameworks, procedures, and proper recommendations for the provision of services during COVID-19. It adds a focused examination and discussion related to factors that could influence the telemedicine guideline, such as culture, religion, legal matters, and how clinical psychologists could expand their telepsychology practice during COVID-19 and after, seeking to produce broadly applicable guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. Professional steps in practical telemedicine were illustrated in tables and examples.

conclusionTelepsychology is not a luxury or a temporary response. Rather, it should be considered part of a proactive governance model to secure a continuity of mental health care services. Arabic communities could benefit from this guideline to telepsychology as an essential protocol for providing mental health services during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Community mental healthCultural competence e-HealthEthicsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33283033
PMCPMC7700766
OpenAlexW3107476024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.