ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020
Effect of Foot-Planting Strategy on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading in Women During a Direction Diversion Maneuver: A Musculoskeletal Modeling Approach.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foot and Ankle Contributions to Noncontact ACL Injury Risk: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Rearfoot striking is associated with lower modeled ACL loading during overground running: a musculoskeletal modeling study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of changes in motor skill induced by educational video program to decrease lower-limb joint load during cutting maneuvers: based on musculoskeletal modeling.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Effect of sprinting velocity on anterior cruciate ligament and knee load during sidestep cutting.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough there is a higher prevalence of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries during a direction diversion maneuver (DDM), no previous studies have reported how foot-planting strategies affect ACL loading. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of foot-planting strategies on ACL loading in women during a DDM task using a musculoskeletal modeling approach. STUDY
designDescriptive laboratory study.
methodsA total of 13 female participants performed a DDM task, which involved running at 4.5 ± 0.2 m/s and turning left at 35° to 55° under a foot-planting strategy in 3 directions: neutral, toe-in, and toe-out. Kinematic and kinetic data were measured with the use of a 3-dimensional motion capture system and force platform to calculate variables such as joint angle, shear force, and moment. Anterior ACL and posterior ACL forces were extracted using musculoskeletal modeling.
resultsThe peak anterior ACL force was significantly larger for the toe-out condition (31.29 ± 4.02 N/body weight [BW]) compared with the toe-in condition (25.43 ± 5.68 N/BW) (
conclusionThrough musculoskeletal modeling, we were able to conclude that the toe-out condition during the DDM might result in a higher risk of ACL injuries. Athletes and sports practitioners should avoid the toe-out foot-planting strategy when participating in a sporting activity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on these findings, medical professionals and athletic coaches can gain knowledge on how foot-planting strategy affects ACL loading. Understanding the actual cause of an ACL injury can be useful for designing preventive training programs or strategies to decrease the risk of such injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.