ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
Microfluidics for Biotechnology: Bridging Gaps to Foster Microfluidic Applications.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advances in Concentration Gradient Generation Approaches in a Microfluidic Device for Toxicity Analysis.Cells · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative numerical and experimental evaluation of 3D-printed micromixers for biotechnological applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-efficiency generation of stably transduced monoclonal cell lines via a laser-induced jetting microfluidic platform.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Disease modelling with in vitro vascularised organoids.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Review
- Advancements and Future Perspectives of Microfluidic Technology in Pediatric Healthcare.Smart medicine · 2025Review
- Experimental and Numerical Study of Slug-Flow Velocity Inside Microchannels Through In Situ Optical Monitoring.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Advancing clinical biochemistry: addressing gaps and driving future innovations.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Observing root growth and signalling responses to stress gradients and pathogens using the bi-directional dual-flow RootChip.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- In Vitro Models for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Untethered soft magnetic pump for microfluidics-based Marangoni surfer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tailored micromixing in chemically patterned microchannels undergoing electromagnetohydrodynamic flow.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- Dynamic microfluidic single-cell screening identifies pheno-tuning compounds to potentiate tuberculosis therapy.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Integrated Microfluidics for Single-Cell Separation and On-Chip Analysis: Novel Applications and Recent Advances.Small science · 2024Article
- Biocatalytic Performance ofMicromachines · 2024Article
- Flexible Toolbox of High-Precision Microfluidic Modules for Versatile Droplet-Based Applications.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Microfluidics for adaptation of microorganisms to stress: design and application.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Microfluidic Single-Cell Study onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Production and purification of outer membrane vesicles encapsulating green fluorescent protein fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of an automated microfluidic perfusion platform for parallelized screening of compounds in vitro.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2023Article
- Scalable Processing of Cyclic Olefin Copolymer (COC) Microfluidic Biochips.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfluidics and novel lab-on-a-chip applications have the potential to boost biotechnological research in ways that are not possible using traditional methods. Although microfluidic tools were increasingly used for different applications within biotechnology in recent years, a systematic and routine use in academic and industrial labs is still not established. For many years, absent innovative, ground-breaking and "out-of-the-box" applications have been made responsible for the missing drive to integrate microfluidic technologies into fundamental and applied biotechnological research. In this review, we highlight microfluidics' offers and compare them to the most important demands of the biotechnologists. Furthermore, a detailed analysis in the state-of-the-art use of microfluidics within biotechnology was conducted exemplarily for four emerging biotechnological fields that can substantially benefit from the application of microfluidic systems, namely the phenotypic screening of cells, the analysis of microbial population heterogeneity, organ-on-a-chip approaches and the characterisation of synthetic co-cultures. The analysis resulted in a discussion of potential "gaps" that can be responsible for the rare integration of microfluidics into biotechnological studies. Our analysis revealed six major gaps, concerning the lack of interdisciplinary communication, mutual knowledge and motivation, methodological compatibility, technological readiness and missing commercialisation, which need to be bridged in the future. We conclude that connecting microfluidics and biotechnology is not an impossible challenge and made seven suggestions to bridge the gaps between those disciplines. This lays the foundation for routine integration of microfluidic systems into biotechnology research procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.