Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33282763›Full record

ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry

Antibacterial Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide with Iodoform versus Calcium Hydroxide with Camphorated Paramonochlorophenol as Intrachannel Pastes on an

Marisa Jara, Doris Salcedo-Moncada, Gerardo Ayala, Romel Watanabe, Daniel Alvítez-Temoche, Frank Mayta-Tovalino

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marisa JaraDepartment of Rehabilitation Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima-Peru.
Doris Salcedo-MoncadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima-Peru.
Gerardo AyalaDepartment of Rehabilitation Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima-Peru.
Romel WatanabeDepartment of Rehabilitation Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima-Peru.
Daniel Alvítez-TemocheAcademic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima-Peru.
Frank Mayta-TovalinoDepartment of Rehabilitation Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima-Peru.
National University of San Marcos · PEFederico Villarreal National University · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess MATERIALS AND

methodsThe diffusion method was used in wells. The strain used was

resultsGroup 1 presented the highest antimicrobial efficacy with a mean of 16.2 ± 0.6 mm, whereas Group 2 only had an antimicrobial effect of 9.7 ± 1.3 mm. Finally, Group 3 only exposed to the positive control (camphor paramonochlorophenol) showed an effect of 14.6 ± 1.0 mm. The inferential analysis showed statistically significant differences between the antimicrobial effect of the three groups (

conclusionCa(OH)

Indexed as

Antibacterial efficacyEnterococcus faecalisintraconduction medicationin vitro study

Identifiers

PMID33282763
PMCPMC7685272
OpenAlexW3089391351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.