Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33282746›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

The Risk of Second Primary Cancers in Prostate Cancer Survivors Treated in the Modern Radiotherapy Era.

Marie-Christina Jahreiß, Katja K H Aben, Mischa S Hoogeman, Maarten L P Dirkx, Kim C de Vries, Luca Incrocci, Wilma D Heemsbergen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Christina JahreißDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Katja K H AbenDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Mischa S HoogemanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Maarten L P DirkxDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kim C de VriesDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Luca IncrocciDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Wilma D HeemsbergenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConcerns have been raised that modern intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may be associated with increased second primary cancer risks (SPC) compared to previous three-dimensional conformal radiation techniques (3DCRT), due to increased low dose volumes and more out-of-field ionizing dose to peripheral tissue further away from the target. We assessed the impact of treatment technique on SPC risks in a cohort of prostate cancer (PCa) survivors. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study cohort comprised 1,561 PCa survivors aged 50-79 years at time of radiotherapy, treated between 2006-2013 (N=707 IMRT, N=854 3DCRT). Treatment details were extracted from radiotherapy systems and merged with longitudinal data of the Netherlands Cancer Registry to identify SPCs. Primary endpoint was the development of a solid SPC (excluding skin cancer) in peripheral anatomical regions, i.e. non-pelvic. Applied latency period was 12 months. SPC rates in the IMRT cohort (total cohort and age subgroups) were compared to 1) the 3DCRT cohort by calculating Sub-Hazard Ratios (sHR) using a competing risk model, and 2) to the general male population by calculating Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR). Models were adjusted for calendar period and age.

resultsMedian follow-up was 8.0 years (accumulated 11,664 person-years at-risk) with 159 cases developing ≥1 non-pelvic SPC. For IMRT vs 3DCRT we observed a significantly (

conclusionIMRT is associated with increased SPC risks for subjects who are relatively young at time of treatment. Additional research on aspects of IMRT that may cause this effect is essential to minimize risks for future patients receiving modern radiotherapy.

Indexed as

intensity-modulated radiotherapyprostate cancersecond primary cancersurvivorshipthree-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33282746
PMCPMC7691574
OpenAlexW3102206155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.