Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33282733›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR Assays for the Simultaneous Screening of Major Genetic Alterations in Tumors of the Central Nervous System.

Romain Appay, Frederic Fina, Doriane Barets, Catherine Gallardo, Isabelle Nanni-Metellus, Didier Scavarda, Daniel Henaff, Juline Vincent, Lise Grewis, Philippe Pourquier and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Circulating tumor DNA in Hodgkin lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Specific and Sensitive Diagnosis ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Romain AppayAPHM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Frederic FinaAPHM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Doriane BaretsAPHM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Catherine GallardoAPHM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Isabelle Nanni-MetellusAPHM, CHU Nord, Service de Transfert d'Oncologie Biologique, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, Marseille, France.
Didier ScavardaAPHM, CHU Timone, Service de Neurochirurgie pédiatrique, Marseille, France.
Daniel HenaffID Solutions, Research and Development, Grabels, France.
Juline VincentID Solutions, Research and Development, Grabels, France.
Lise GrewisID Solutions, Research and Development, Grabels, France.
Philippe PourquierID Solutions, Research and Development, Grabels, France.
Carole ColinAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France.
Dominique Figarella-BrangerAPHM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Hôpital de la Timone · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Nord · FRInstitut de Neurophysiopathologie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased integration of molecular alterations to define tumor type or grade in central nervous system (CNS) tumor classification brings new challenges for the pathologist to make the best use of a precious limited tissue specimen for molecular studies. Within the different methods available to identify gene alterations, the droplet digital PCR (dPCR) constitutes a rapid, cost-effective, and very sensitive tool. In this study, we describe the development and validation of five multiplexed dPCR assays to detect major CNS biomarkers by using only small amounts of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. When compared to HRM-sequencing, NGS-sequencing, RNA-sequencing, or simplex digital PCR assays used as "gold standard" methods, these multiplexed dPCR assays displayed 100% specificity and sensitivity for the simultaneous detection of: 1/BRAF V600E mutation and KIAA1549:BRAF fusion; 2/FGFR1 N546K and K656E mutations and FGFR1 duplication; 3/H3F3A K27M and G34R/V mutations; 4/IDH1 R132X and IDH2 R172X mutations; and 5/TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T. In light of the increased integration of molecular alteration, we believe that such strategies might help laboratories to optimize their screening strategies for routine diagnosis of pediatric and adult CNS tumors.

Indexed as

biomarkersformaldehyde-fixed sample tissueglial and glioneuronal tumorsmolecular screening testmultiplexed droplet digital PCR assaytumors of the central nervous system

Identifiers

PMID33282733
PMCPMC7689380
OpenAlexW3100209659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.