Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33282656›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical ultrasound

A Brief Review for Common Doppler Ultrasound Flow Phantoms.

Sabri M Shalbi, Ammar A Oglat, Balid Albarbar, Fuzi Elkut, M A Qaeed, Ali Abu Arra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabri M ShalbiDepartment of Sciences Medical, Higher Institute Sciences Medical, Elkhomes, Libya.
Ammar A OglatDepartment of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Balid AlbarbarDepartment of Sciences Medical, Faculty of Health Sciences, Elmergib University, Elkhomes, Libya.
Fuzi ElkutDepartment of Sciences Medical, Higher Institute Sciences Medical, Elkhomes, Libya.
M A QaeedDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Abu ArraDepartment of Medical Imaging, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, the flow phantoms and the wall-less flow phantoms with recognized acoustic features (attenuation and speed of sound), interior properties, and dimensions of tissue were prepared, calibrated, and characterized by Doppler ultrasound (US) scanning which demands tissue-mimicking materials (TMMs). TMM phantoms are commercially available and readymade for medical US applications. Furthermore, the commercial TMM phantoms are proper for US purpose or estimation of diagnostic imaging techniques according to the chemical materials used for its preparation.

Indexed as

Doppler ultrasound scanningflow phantomsultrasonographywall-less flow phantoms

Identifiers

PMID33282656
PMCPMC7709522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.