ArticleCureus2020
Clinical Spectrum in a Cohort of Patients With High Fecal Calprotectin Levels.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Fecal Calprotectin in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Abdominal Pain with or without Diarrhea or Rectal Bleeding.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024Observational
- Assessment of serum neopterin and calprotectin as biomarkers for subclinical inflammation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDistinguishing between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and functional gastrointestinal disorders is a diagnostic challenge. The need for non-invasive biomarker as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is required. The objectives of current study were to determine the spectrum of clinical features in patients tested for fecal calprotectin presenting with high levels and to compare calprotectin levels among already diagnosed patients known to have IBD as per biopsy findings and documented on patients' file with newly presenting patients who were being investigated and did not have a diagnosis.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan from January 2017 to December 2019. Subjects tested for fecal calprotectin who had elevated fecal calprotectin levels (n = 150) were included in the current study. Each patient deposited a random stool sample in an airtight container for calprotectin analysis. Biochemical analysis of calprotectin was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using epitope calprotectin test kit (Epitope Diagnostics, Italy) on ETI-Max 3000 immunoassay analyzer (DiaSorin, Italy). A structured history form was used for data collection. Results: One hundred and fifty patients were available for inclusion in the final analysis. Majority of the patients (n = 117, 78%) were adults (>18 years of age), and 52.7% (n = 79) were females. Median fecal calprotectin (IQR) was 317.3 μg/g (549.10 - 239.2 μg/g) in children (n = 33) and 305 μg/g (609.9 - 201.6 μg/g) in adults; the difference was statistically non-significant (p value > 0.05). On categorization according to disease, fecal calprotectin levels were significantly elevated (p value = 0.033) in IBD patients compared to normal subjects, 644 μg/g (644 - 587.8 μg/g) vs 308.5 μg/g (505.4 - 233.8 μg/g), respectively. Diarrhea (n = 13, 38.4%), abdominal cramps (n = 12, 36.4%), and weight loss (n = 11, 33.3%) were the most common complaints noted in children with high fecal calprotectin levels, whereas in adults, abdominal cramps (n = 60, 51.3%), diarrhea (n = 59, 50.4%), and weight loss (n = 46, 39.3%) were the common complaints. The median fecal calprotectin levels in children already known to have IBD (n = 3) were higher than the levels noted in children with no diagnosis (n = 30); p value > 0.05. Similarly, median fecal calprotectin levels in adults with IBD (n = 28) were higher than the levels noted in patients with no specific diagnosis (n = 91), 400.7 μg/g (656.6 - 244.3 μg/g) vs 302.7 μg/g (564.6 - 206 μg/g); p value > 0.05.
conclusionCurrent study affirms that the fecal calprotectin test can be used in identifying IBD patients in all age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.