ArticleBiomedical optics express2020
Capability of physically reasonable OCT-based differentiation between intact brain tissues, human brain gliomas of different WHO grades, and glioma model 101.8 from rats.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Original Mouse Models of Glioblastoma: Analysis of Pathophysiological Characteristics of Transplanted Tumor Tissue.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2025Article
- Quantification of attenuation and speckle features from endoscopic OCT images for the diagnosis of human brain glioma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Measurement of tissue optical properties in a wide spectral range: a review [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Single-cell all-optical coherence elastography with optical tweezers.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Terahertz dielectric spectroscopy and solid immersion microscopy ofBiomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Terahertz dielectric spectroscopy of human brain gliomas and intact tissuesBiomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.