ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2020
Outcomes of presumed malignant glioma treated without pathological confirmation: a retrospective, single-center analysis.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stable glioma incidence and increased patient survival over the past two decades in Norway: a nationwide registry-based cohort study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Real-world validity of randomized controlled phase III trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: to whom do the results of the trials apply?Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTissue diagnosis is essential in the usual management of high-grade glioma. In rare circumstances, due to patient preference, performance status, comorbidities, or tumor location, biopsy is not feasible. Sometimes a biopsy is nondiagnostic. Many neuro-oncology clinics have patients like this, but these patients' outcomes and responses to treatment are not known.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed records from adult patients diagnosed with presumed high-grade glioma of the brain without definitive pathology, diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. We recorded several clinical variables including date of first diagnostic imaging and date of death.
resultsWe identified 61 patients and subclassified them to brainstem glioma (n = 32), supratentorial presumed glioblastoma (n = 24), presumed thalamic diffuse midline glioma (n = 2), gliomatosis cerebri (n = 2), and cerebellar glioma (n = 1). Most brainstem glioma patients had no biopsy because of tumor location. Supratentorial presumed glioblastoma patients had no biopsy predominantly because of comorbidities. Median survival, from first diagnostic imaging, was 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.9 to 6.3 months) in the supratentorial glioblastoma group and 18.5 months (95% CI: 13.0 to 44.1 months) in the brainstem group. Treatment with radiation or chemotherapy did not alter the median survival of the supratentorial glioblastoma group (hazard ratio 1.41, uncorrected
conclusionsPatients with imaging diagnoses of high-grade glioma have similar, if not worse, survival than those with pathological confirmation. Based on these uncontrolled data, it is unclear how effective radiation or chemotherapy is in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.