Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33282295›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2020

Pregnant women's satisfaction with antenatal care services and its associated factors at public health facilities in the Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia.

Simon Birhanu, Melake Demena, Yohannes Baye, Assefa Desalew, Bedru Dawud, Gudina Egata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon BirhanuSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7852-5902
Melake DemenaSchool of Public Health, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Yohannes BayeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Assefa DesalewSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-0708
Bedru DawudDepartment of Psychiatry, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Gudina EgataDepartment of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal care coverage is very low in low-and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia. Self-reported pregnant women's satisfaction may be important in identifying the demographic, provider-, and facility-related factors that can be improved to increase antenatal care satisfaction. However, there is a paucity of data on pregnant women's satisfaction in Ethiopia, particularly in the study setting. Therefore, this study aimed to assess antenatal care service satisfaction and associated factors among pregnant women at public health facilities in the Harari region of eastern Ethiopia.

methodsA health institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among women who were attending antenatal care clinics in February 2017. All 531 pregnant women were selected using a systematic random sampling method. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire, entered into EpiData version 3.1, and analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 software. A logistic regression model was applied to control for confounders. The level of significance was determined at a p-value of less than 0.05.

resultsThe magnitude of pregnant women's satisfaction with antenatal care services was 70.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 66.4%-74.3%). Receiving antenatal care services from the hospital (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.50-3.98), did not attend formal education (AOR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.52-4.20) and attended primary education (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.17-4.04), having a repeated visit to antenatal care (AOR = 4.62, 95% CI = 2.98-7.17), initiating antenatal care services within the first trimester (AOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.12-2.71), having no history of stillbirth (AOR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.37-4.65), and waiting for no more than 30 min in the health facility to get service (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.28-4.16) were factors associated with pregnant women's satisfaction with antenatal care services.

conclusionMore than two-thirds of pregnant women were satisfied with the antenatal care service. The type of health facility, education status, number and initiation time of antenatal visit, history of stillbirth, and waiting time to get service were factors associated with pregnant women's satisfaction with antenatal care services.

Indexed as

Antenatal careEthiopiaHarari regionpregnant womensatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33282295
PMCPMC7686589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.