ArticleFood science & nutrition2020
Safety assessment of
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bacteria of healthy periodontal tissues as candidates of probiotics: a systematic review.European journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- In vitro assessment of the probiotic potential and safety of lactic acid bacteria for aquatic animal health.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Analysis of the Immunostimulatory Properties and Safety Profile ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Lysates from the probiotic bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus enhances the survival of T cells and triggers programmed cell death in neuroblastoma cells.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Article
- Probiotic Characteristics and Safety Assessment ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Potential ofFood science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Influence of high-fat diet on host animal health via bile acid metabolism and benefits of oral-fed Streptococcus thermophilus MN-ZLW-002.Experimental animals · 2022Article
- Safety evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2022Article
- Safety assessment ofFood science & nutrition · 2020Article
- Benefits and concerns of probiotics: an overview of the potential genotoxicity of the colibactin-producingGut microbesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safety evaluation of probiotics has become increasingly important for human consumption in food industry. The aims of this study were to assess safety of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.