Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33282224›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2020

Mortality in India established through verbal autopsies (MINErVA): Strengthening national mortality surveillance system in India.

Anand Krishnan, Vivek Gupta, Baridalyne Nongkynrih, Rakesh Kumar, Ravneet Kaur, Sumit Malhotra, Harshal R Salve, Venkatesh Narayan, Ayon Gupta, MINErVA Network†

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anand KrishnanCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vivek GuptaDr Rajendra Prasad Centre of Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Baridalyne NongkynrihCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh KumarCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ravneet KaurCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sumit MalhotraCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Harshal R SalveCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Venkatesh NarayanCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ayon GuptaCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
MINErVA Network†

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing data access and storage concerns, Government of India transferred the management of its Sample Registration System (SRS) based mortality surveillance (formerly known as the Million Death Study) to an Indian agency. This paper introduces the new system, challenges it faced and its vision for future.

methodsThe All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, the new nodal agency, established the "Mortality in India Established through Verbal Autopsy" (MINErVA) platform with state level partners across India in November 2017. The network in its first three years has undertaken capacity building of supervisors conducting verbal autopsy under the SRS, established a panel of trained physician reviewers and developed three IT-based platforms for training, quality control and coding. Coding of VA forms started from January 2015 onwards, and the cause specific mortality fractions (CSMF) of the first 14 185 adult verbal autopsy (VA) records for 2015 were compared with earlier published data for 2010-2013 to check for continuity of system performance.

resultsThe network consists of 25 institutions and a panel of 676 trained physician reviewers. 916 supervisors have been trained in conducting verbal autopsies. More than 75 000 VA forms have been coded to date. The median time taken for finalizing cause of death on the coding platform is 37 days. The level of physician agreement (67%) and proportion of VA forms requiring adjudication (12%) are consistent with published literature. Preliminary CSMF estimates for 2015 were comparable with those for 2010-2013 and identified same top ten causes of death. In addition to the delay, two major challenges identified for coding were language proficiency of physician reviewers vis-à-vis language of narratives and quality of verbal autopsies. While an initial strategic decision was made to consolidate the system to ensure continuity, future vision of the network is to move towards technology-based solutions including electronic data capture of VAs and its analysis and improving the use of mortality data in decision making.

conclusionMINErVA network is now fully functional and is moving towards achieving global standards. It provides valuable lessons for other developing countries to establish their own mortality surveillance systems.

Indexed as

AutopsyMortalityAdultCause of DeathHumansIndiaPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID33282224
PMCPMC7688192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.