Articlei-Perception
Scent and the Cinema.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The scent of attraction and the smell of success: crossmodal influences on person perception.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021Review
- Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Using Ambient Scent to Enhance Well-Being in the Multisensory Built Environment.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Scenting Entertainment: Virtual Reality Storytelling, Theme Park Rides, Gambling, and Video-Gaming.i-PerceptionArticle
- Article
- Narrative historical review of scratch-and-sniff books and their key storytelling features.i-PerceptionArticle
- Article
- Article
- What role does touch play in active entertainment? A narrative review of tactile feedback in gaming.i-PerceptionArticle
- Scenting the Anosmic Cube: On the Use of Ambient Scent in the Context of the Art Gallery or Museum.i-PerceptionReview
- Article
- Scent and the Cinema.i-PerceptionArticle
- Scent in the Context of Live Performance.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From the very earliest days of public cinema (moving pictures), there has been consideration about how odors and scents might influence the viewer's experience. While initially this was primarily a concern with how to eliminate the malodor of the cinema-goers themselves, in more recent times, there have been a number of well-publicized attempts to add synchronized pleasant (and, on occasion, also unpleasant) scents to "enhance" the cinema experience. While early solutions such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.