Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281994›Full record

ArticleRace and social problems2018

Genes, Race, and Causation: US Public Perspectives About Racial Difference.

Simon Outram, Joseph L Graves, Jill Powell, Chantelle Wolpert, Kerry L Haynie, Morris W Foster, Jessica W Blanchard, Anna Hoffmeyer, Robert P Agans, Charmaine Dm Royal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Race and social problems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Simon OutramCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Joseph L GravesCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Jill PowellCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Chantelle WolpertCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Kerry L HaynieCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Morris W FosterCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Jessica W BlanchardCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Anna HoffmeyerCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Robert P AgansCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Charmaine Dm RoyalCenter for Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) Social Science Research Institute, C103C Duke University Box 90420 Durham, NC 27708-0420 office.
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEmory and Henry College · USNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University · USOld Dominion University · USSocial Science Research Council · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Public Perspectives and Experience Regarding Genetic Ancestry TestingR01HG006295 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROYAL, CHARMAINE DAWN MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns have been raised that the increase in popular interest in genetics may herald a new era within which racial inequities are seen as 'natural' or immutable. In the following study, we provide data from a nationally representative survey on how the US population perceives general ability, athleticism, and intellect being determined by race and/or genetics and whether they believe racial health inequities to be primarily the product of genetic or social factors. We find that self-described race is of primary importance in attributing general ability to race, increasing age is a significant factor in attributing athleticism and intellect to genes and race, and education is a significant factor in decreasing such racially and genetically deterministic views . Beliefs about the meaning of race are statistically significantly associated with respect to the perception of athletic abilities and marginally associated with the perception of racial health inequalities being either socially or genetically derived. Race, education, socioeconomic status, and concepts of race were frequently found to be multiplicative in their statistical effects. The persistent acceptance of a genetically and racially deterministic view of athleticism among the White and older population group is discussed in respect to its social impact, as is the high level of agreement that general abilities are determined by race among non-White respondents and those of lower socioeconomic status. We argue that these findings highlight that both biological and non-biological forms of understanding race continue to play a role into the politics of race and social difference within contemporary US society.

Indexed as

CausalityDeterminismGeneticsHealthInequityRace

Identifiers

PMID33281994
PMCPMC7717494
OpenAlexW2789724191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.