Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281987›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2019

Shear Stress in Bone Marrow has a Dose Dependent Effect on cFos Gene Expression in

Kimberly J Curtis, Thomas R Coughlin, Mary A Varsanik, Glen L Niebur

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly J CurtisTissue Mechanics Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
Thomas R CoughlinTissue Mechanics Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
Mary A VarsanikTissue Mechanics Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
Glen L NieburTissue Mechanics Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7134-2716
University of Notre Dame · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMechanical stimulation of bone is necessary to maintain its mass and architecture. Osteocytes within the mineralized matrix are sensors of mechanical deformation of the hard tissue, and communicate with cells in the marrow to regulate bone remodeling. However, marrow cells are also subjected to mechanical stress during whole bone loading, and may contribute to mechanically regulated bone physiology. Previous results from our laboratory suggest that mechanotransduction in marrow cells is sufficient to cause bone formation in the absence of osteocyte signaling. In this study, we investigated whether bone formation and altered marrow cell gene expression response to stimulation was dependent on the shear stress imparted on the marrow by our loading regime.

methodsPorcine trabecular bone explants were cultured in an

resultsVibratory stimulation resulted in a higher trabecular bone formation rate (

conclusionsThe results suggest that the shear stress due to interactions between marrow cells induces a mechanobiological response. Identification of marrow cell mechanotransduction pathways is essential to understand healthy and pathological bone adaptation and remodeling.

Indexed as

Bone adaptationComputational modelingGene regulationMechanobiologyTrabecular bone

Identifiers

PMID33281987
PMCPMC7710767
OpenAlexW2972222448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.