Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281900›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology research and practice2020

Diagnostic Criteria of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: A Focused Systematic Review.

Kim van Sinderen, Lothar A Schwarte, Patrick Schober

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05398757 (The Effect of Intraoperative Administration of Dexmedetomidine, Propofol and Midazolam on Postoperative Levels of Inflammatory Markers and Development of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Pertrochanteric Fracture Surgery.), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05398757 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Intraoperative Administration of Dexmedetomidine, Propofol and Midazolam on Postoperative Levels of Inflammatory Markers and Development of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Pertrochanteric Fracture Surgery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOsijek University HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsPostoperative Cognitive Dysfunction, Postoperative Pain, Acute, Pertrochanteric FractureArmsMini mental state exame (MMSE), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Numeric rating Scale (NRS), Postoperative inflammation, Midazolam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kim van SinderenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lothar A SchwarteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-7810
Patrick SchoberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-081X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) is characterized by a deterioration in cognitive performance after surgery and is increasingly addressed in research studies. However, a uniform definition of POCD seems to be lacking, which is a major threat to clinical research in this area. We performed a focused systematic review to determine the current degree of heterogeneity in how POCD is defined across studies and to identify those diagnostic criteria that are used most commonly. The search identified 173 records, of which 30 were included. Neurocognitive testing was most commonly performed shortly before surgery and at 7 days postoperatively. A variety of neurocognitive tests were used to test a range of cognitive domains, including complex attention, language, executive functioning, perceptual-motor function, and learning and memory. The tests that were used most commonly were the Mini-Mental State Examination, the digit span test, the trail making test part A, and the digit symbol substitution test, but consensus on which test result would be considered "positive" for POCD was sparse. The results of this systematic review suggest the lack of a consistent approach towards defining POCD. However, commonalities were identified which may serve as a common denominator for deriving consensus-based diagnostic guidelines for POCD.

Identifiers

PMID33281900
PMCPMC7685826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.