Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281886›Full record

ReviewThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2020

Zika virus serological diagnosis: commercial tests and monoclonal antibodies as tools.

Isaura Beatriz Borges Silva, Aldacilene Souza da Silva, Mariana Sequetin Cunha, Aline Diniz Cabral, Kelly Cristina Alves de Oliveira, Elizabeth De Gaspari, Carlos Roberto Prudencio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Zika Virus Envelope Protein Domain III Produced inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isaura Beatriz Borges SilvaCenter of Immunology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Aldacilene Souza da SilvaCenter of Immunology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mariana Sequetin CunhaDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Aline Diniz CabralCenter of Immunology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Kelly Cristina Alves de OliveiraCenter of Immunology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Elizabeth De GaspariCenter of Immunology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Roberto PrudencioCenter of Immunology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7701-0707
Instituto Adolfo Lutz · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV), an emerging arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) of the

Indexed as

Commercial testsFlavivirusesMonoclonal antibodySerological diagnosisZika virus

Identifiers

PMID33281886
PMCPMC7685096
OpenAlexW3110098135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.