ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020
Microbiomes for All.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome education at under-resourced institutions: current status, barriers, and approaches to successful implementation.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Illuminating the "black boxes" of microbiome sequencing.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Advancing FAIR data towards comparable, organized, predictive AI-ready data for community validation.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Fantastic microbes and where to find them: evaluating learning-by-doing outcomes in a crowdfunded metagenomics workshop.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
- A non-hypothesis-driven practical laboratory activity on functional metagenomics: "fishing" protein-coding DNA sequences from microbiomes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- When the microbiome meets One Health principle: Leading to the Holy Grail of biology and contributing to overall well-being and social sustainability.iMetaOmics · 2024Review
- Impact of Novel Foods on the Human Gut Microbiome: Current Status.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- It is time to authenticate the Microbiome Sciences with accredited educational programs and departments.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Communicating the utility of the microbiome and bioinformatics to small flock poultry producers.Poultry science · 2022Review
- Combating Antimicrobial Resistance Through Student-Driven Research and Environmental Surveillance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome research projects are often interdisciplinary, involving fields such as microbiology, genetics, ecology, evolution, bioinformatics, and statistics. These research projects can be an excellent fit for undergraduate courses ranging from introductory biology labs to upper-level capstone courses. Microbiome research projects can attract the interest of students majoring in health and medical sciences, environmental sciences, and agriculture, and there are meaningful ties to real-world issues relating to human health, climate change, and environmental sustainability and resilience in pristine, fragile ecosystems to bustling urban centers. In this review, we will discuss the potential of microbiome research integrated into classes using a number of different modalities. Our experience scaling-up and implementing microbiome projects at a range of institutions across the US has provided us with insight and strategies for what works well and how to diminish common hurdles that are encountered when implementing undergraduate microbiome research projects. We will discuss how course-based microbiome research can be leveraged to help faculty make advances in their own research and professional development and the resources that are available to support faculty interested in integrating microbiome research into their courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.