Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281733›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2020

Selective Brain Hypothermia in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Reperfusion Without Reperfusion Injury.

Jae H Choi, Sven Poli, Michael Chen, Thanh N Nguyen, Jeffrey L Saver, Charles Matouk, John Pile-Spellman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06634303 (Hybernia Delta H), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06634303 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Hybernia Delta H (ΔH) Brain Cooling System for: Post-Mechanical Endovascular Cerebral Cooling

TypeinterventionalSponsorHybernia MedicalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled8ConditionsAcute Ischemic StrokeArmsBrain cooling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jae H ChoiNeurovascular Center, Neurological Surgery, P.C., Lake Success, NY, United States.
Sven PoliDepartment of Neurology & Stroke, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Michael ChenStroke Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Thanh N NguyenInterventional Neurology/Neuroradiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Jeffrey L SaverComprehensive Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Charles MatoukNeurovascular Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, United States.
John Pile-SpellmanNeurovascular Center, Neurological Surgery, P.C., Lake Success, NY, United States.
Boston University · USHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DENeurological Surgery · USRush University Medical Center · USSound Shore Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In acute ischemic stroke, early recanalization of the occluded artery is crucial for best outcome to be achieved. Recanalization aims at restoring blood flow to the ischemic tissue (reperfusion) and is achieved with pharmacological thrombolytic drugs, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) devices, or both. The introduction of modern endovascular devices has led to tremendous anatomical and clinical success with rates of substantial reperfusion exceeding 80% and proven clinical benefit in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (LVOs). However, not every successful reperfusion procedure leads to the desired clinical outcome. In fact, the rate of non-disabled outcome at 3 months with current EVT treatment is ~1 out of 4. A constraint upon better outcomes is that reperfusion, though resolving ischemic stress, may not restore the anatomic structures and metabolic functions of ischemic tissue to their baseline states. In fact, ischemia triggers a complex cascade of destructive mechanisms that can sometimes be exacerbated rather than alleviated by reperfusion therapy. Such reperfusion injury may cause infarct progression, intracranial hemorrhage, and unfavorable outcome. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to have a favorable impact on the molecular elaboration of ischemic injury, but systemic hypothermia is limited by slow speed of attaining target temperatures and clinical complications. A novel approach is endovascular delivery of hypothermia to cool the affected brain tissue selectively and rapidly with tight local temperature control, features not available with systemic hypothermia devices. In this perspective article, we discuss the possible benefits of adjunctive selective endovascular brain hypothermia during interventional stroke treatment.

Indexed as

brain coolinghypothermianeuroprotectionreperfusionreperfusion injuryselective endovascular brain coolingstroke

Identifiers

PMID33281733
PMCPMC7691595
OpenAlexW3102869048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.