Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

Protocol for the Prognostication of Consciousness Recovery Following a Brain Injury.

Catherine Duclos, Loretta Norton, Geoffrey Laforge, Allison Frantz, Charlotte Maschke, Mohamed Badawy, Justin Letourneau, Marat Slessarev, Teneille Gofton, Derek Debicki and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine DuclosSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Loretta NortonDepartment of Psychology, King's University College at Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Geoffrey LaforgeThe Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Allison FrantzMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Charlotte MaschkeMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mohamed BadawyDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Justin LetourneauDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marat SlessarevThe Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Teneille GoftonDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Derek DebickiThe Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Adrian M OwenThe Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Stefanie Blain-MoraesSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Western University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals who have suffered a severe brain injury typically require extensive hospitalization in intensive care units (ICUs), where critical treatment decisions are made to maximize their likelihood of recovering consciousness and cognitive function. These treatment decisions can be difficult when the neurological assessment of the patient is limited by unreliable behavioral responses. Reliable objective and quantifiable markers are lacking and there is both (1) a poor understanding of the mechanisms underlying the brain's ability to reconstitute consciousness and cognition after an injury and (2) the absence of a reliable and clinically feasible method of tracking cognitive recovery in ICU survivors. Our goal is to develop and validate a clinically relevant EEG paradigm that can inform the prognosis of unresponsive, brain-injured patients in the ICU. This protocol describes a study to develop a point-of-care system intended to accurately predict outcomes of unresponsive, brain-injured patients in the ICU. We will recruit 200 continuously-sedated brain-injured patients across five ICUs. Between 24 h and 7 days post-ICU admission, high-density EEG will be recorded from behaviorally unresponsive patients before, during and after a brief cessation of pharmacological sedation. Once patients have reached the waking stage, they will be asked to complete an abridged Cambridge Brain Sciences battery, a web-based series of neurocognitive tests. The test series will be repeated every day during acute admission (ICU, ward), or as often as possible given the constraints of ICU and ward care. Following discharge, patients will continue to complete the same test series on weekly, and then monthly basis, for up to 12 months following injury. Functional outcomes will also be assessed up to 12 months post-injury. We anticipate our findings will lead to an increased ability to identify patients, as soon as possible after their brain injury, who are most likely to survive, and to make accurate predictions about their long-term cognitive and functional outcome. In addition to providing critically needed support for clinical decision-making, this study has the potential to transform our understanding of key functional EEG networks associated with consciousness and cognition.

Indexed as

brain injurycognitive testingcomaconsciousnesscontinuous sedationEEGintensive care unitprognosis

Identifiers

PMID33281582
PMCPMC7690215
OpenAlexW3100994746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.