ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020
Researcher Perspectives on Ethical Considerations in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Trials.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of rodent studies of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of neurological, developmental and neuropsychiatric disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Implantable Neuromodulation Devices in Psychiatry: Human Fidelity and Implementation Challenges.The American journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Proceedings of the 13th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: the evolving landscape.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Current Neuroethical Perspectives on Deep Brain Stimulation and Neuromodulation for Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Scoping Review of the Past 10 Years.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Best practices for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric indications.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Scientists' perspectives on ethical issues in research with emerging portable neuroimaging technology: The need for guidance on ethical, legal, and societal implications (ELSI).NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Neuropsychological and social predictors of participation in a deep brain stimulation study of Parkinson's disease and dystonia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Neurostimulation treatments for epilepsy: Deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation and vagus nerve stimulation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024Review
- Post-trial access to implantable neural devices: an exploratory international survey.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2024Article
- Stakeholders' Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.AJOB empirical bioethics · 2024Article
- Ethical considerations for integrating multimodal computer perception and neurotechnology.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Playing Brains: The Ethical Challenges Posed by Silicon Sentience and Hybrid Intelligence in DishBrain.Science and engineering ethics · 2023Article
- A Call for Behavioral Science in Embedded Bioethics.Perspectives in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- Researchers' Ethical Concerns About Using Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Enhancement.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing in Deep Brain Stimulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Researcher Views on Changes in Personality, Mood, and Behavior in Next-Generation Deep Brain Stimulation.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- Trust in Neuroethics.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- Exit from Brain Device Research: A Modified Grounded Theory Study of Researcher Obligations and Participant Experiences.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- The Development of Self-Trust in DBS Patients.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Interest and investment in closed-loop or adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) systems have quickly expanded due to this neurotechnology's potential to more safely and effectively treat refractory movement and psychiatric disorders compared to conventional DBS. A large neuroethics literature outlines potential ethical concerns about conventional DBS and aDBS systems. Few studies, however, have examined stakeholder perspectives about ethical issues in aDBS research and other next-generation DBS devices. To help fill this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with researchers involved in aDBS trials (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.