Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281462›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders2020

Efficacy and Safety of Hylan G-F 20 Versus Intra-Articular Corticosteroids in People with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Xavier Chevalier, Brendan Sheehan, Craig Whittington, Mir-Masoud Pourrahmat, Lionel Duarte, Wilson Ngai, Gustavo Constantino de Campos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Xavier ChevalierDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Paris University XII (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Brendan SheehanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Craig WhittingtonDoctor Evidence, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-0334
Mir-Masoud PourrahmatEvidinno Outcomes Research Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lionel DuarteDoctor Evidence, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Wilson NgaiSanofi, Global Medical, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Gustavo Constantino de CamposUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Sanofi (United States) · USDalhousie University · CAUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect injection of corticosteroids into the joint is a standard treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the treatment is somewhat controversial with regard to the benefit of both single and repeated injections; evidence that they are beneficial comes from small studies that show only modest improvements. The aim of this study was to estimate the short- and long-term clinical efficacy and safety of hylan G-F 20 versus intra-articular corticosteroids (IACS) for the treatment of pain in knee OA using Bayesian network meta-analysis.

methodsBased on a pre-specified protocol, MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to June 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials was used to assess the included studies. Hylan G-F 20 and IACS were compared using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Efficacy was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months, and at the final follow-up for safety outcomes. A pain hierarchy was used to select 1 pain outcome per study.

resultsForty-two trials were included for analysis. The network meta-analysis of pain showed that hylan G-F 20 may be equivalent to IACS in the short-term, but by 6 months the benefit relative to IACS was statistically significant, standardized mean difference (95% credible interval): -0.13 (-0.26, -0.01). There were no statistical differences in adverse events.

conclusionsHylan G-F 20 may perform better in relieving pain at 6 months post-injection compared to IACS. Both agents were relatively well tolerated, with no clear differences in safety.

Indexed as

hyaluronic acidinjectionsintra-articularkneemolecular weightnetwork meta-analysisOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID33281462
PMCPMC7691947
OpenAlexW3110108287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.