Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281412›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020

To Evaluate the Accuracy of Axillary Staging Using Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (USG-FNAC) in Early Breast Cancer Patients-a Prospective Study.

Rashpal Singh, S V S Deo, Ekta Dhamija, Sandeep Mathur, Sanjay Thulkar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rashpal SinghDepartment of Surgical Oncology, BRA, IRCH, All India Institute Of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
S V S DeoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, BRA, IRCH, All India Institute Of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Ekta DhamijaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, BRA, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Sandeep MathurDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Sanjay ThulkarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, BRA, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In breast cancer, axillary lymph node involvement directly impacts the patient survival and prognosis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a procedure of choice for axillary staging in early breast cancer. Currently, management options for axilla management are axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy in node positive and in node negative respectively. Accuracy of current clinical methods for evaluating axilla is low. Hence, to select patients for appropriate procedure, ultrasound (USG) combined with fine-needle aspiration cytology (USG-FNAC) using vascular pedicle-based nodal mapping method is emerging as a good tool to address above issues. We evaluated the feasibility of ultrasound and needle aspiration cytology in a tertiary care center. All early breast cancer patients with clinically node-negative axilla and having palpable nodes with less than or equal to 5 cm tumor size in breast were screened by ultrasound of axilla to categorize the nodes as suspicious or non-suspicious based on radiological features and vascular pedicle-based nodal mapping method of axilla. Patients having suspicious nodes underwent ultrasound of axilla and needle aspiration; if found positive, patient underwent axillary node dissection. Sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) performed in all patients found negative on needle aspiration and in all patients having non-suspicious nodes on ultrasound axilla. Final histopathology was taken as gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for ultrasound (USG) and ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (USG-FNAC). A total of 100 patients were included in which 58 had non-suspicious and 42 had suspicious nodes on ultrasound of axilla. Among suspicious group, 24 were positive on ultrasound-guided needle aspiration cytology and 18 were negative. In non-suspicious nodes, sentinel node biopsy was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for ultrasound were 61.5%, 75.6%, 69.5%, and 68.5% respectively. For ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (USG-FNAC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value are 83%, 100%, 100%, and 72.6% respectively. The accuracy of ultrasound (USG) and ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (USG-FNAC) was 69% and 88.1%. The result of our study indicates the feasibility of USG and USG-FNAC in a high-volume center with good accuracy of around 70-80%. Approximately one-fourth (24%) of the total patients were taken up for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without performing SLNB.

Indexed as

Axillary StagingEarly Breast CancerUltrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology(USG-FNAC)

Identifiers

PMID33281412
PMCPMC7714810
OpenAlexW3093270143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.