Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281409›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020

Lymph Node Harvest After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer and Its Impact on Oncological Outcomes.

Rajkumar Billakanti, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri, Srikanth Soma, Hemanth Makineni, Shirley Sundersingh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajkumar BillakantiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Dr.S.Krishnamurthy Campus, No.18, Sardar Patel road, Guindy, Chennai, 600036 India.
Ramakrishnan Ayloor SeshadriDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Dr.S.Krishnamurthy Campus, No.18, Sardar Patel road, Guindy, Chennai, 600036 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-0237
Srikanth SomaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Dr.S.Krishnamurthy Campus, No.18, Sardar Patel road, Guindy, Chennai, 600036 India.
Hemanth MakineniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Dr.S.Krishnamurthy Campus, No.18, Sardar Patel road, Guindy, Chennai, 600036 India.
Shirley SundersinghDepartment of Onco-Pathology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, 600036 India.
Cancer Institute (WIA) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of neoadjuvant treatment on nodal harvest after rectal cancer surgery and its impact on long-term oncological outcomes. A retrospective analysis of patients with rectal cancer who received curative intent treatment from 2002 to 2012 in our institution was performed. Data on various clinic-pathological and treatment details were recovered from the records. The number of nodes harvested after surgery was analyzed. The influence of number of nodes harvested on overall survival and disease free survival was analyzed. Among the 459 patients included in this study, 326 underwent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The mean number of nodes harvested was significantly lower in patients who received NAT compared with those who did not (8.9 ± 5.77 vs 14 ± 9.84,

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant chemoradiationNodal harvestRectal cancerSurgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID33281409
PMCPMC7714796
OpenAlexW3044107563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.